Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1917No. 678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

Appellant bought 100 mares from appellee, and gave his note, in the sum of $6,400, as purchase money therefor. He also borrowed $100 in cash, and gave his note therefor. These notes were secured by a chattel mortgage upon the said mares and upon three jacks, as additional security. The $100 note fell due on November 1, 1914, and the $6,400 note fell due on December 1, 1915. The chattel mortgage provided that failure to pay the $100 note when due should mature the $6,400 note. Appellant defaulted in the payment of said $100 note, and the other note was declared due, and the property was sold…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southwest Nat. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Latimer v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Southwest Nat. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API