Woods v. State

STATON, Judge.

Andrew Woods appeals his convictions for dealing in cocaine1 and conspiracy to deal in cocaine,2 Class A felonies. His sole allegation of error is that his convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence of probative value because he was "entrapped," ie., persuaded into engaging in the alleged criminal conduct by a law enforcement officer and his agent.

We note initially that the State has not favored us with a brief for this appeal; therefore, Woods may prevail by making a prima facie showing of reversible error. Pettiford v. State (1987), Ind.App., 504 N.E.2d 324. See also…