Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1945No. 11373PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The question involved here is one of intent, that is, whether or not the petitioners intended to make a completed gift inter vivos of the corporate stock to their respective wives, or whether the stock was placed in their wives’ names only for tax purposes with the alleged donors retaining the same dominion and control as if there had been no transfer. There are ample facts in the record to justify the factual finding by the Tax Court that the donors merely intended to accomplish the latter purpose. Under Dobson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Gallagher v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Saulsbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Apt v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  5. Gouldman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API