Legal Opinion

In re Inquiry Concerning O'Flaherty

State of California Commission On Judicial Performance

Decided September 29, 2004No. 171Published

1Opinion of the Court

*CJP Supp. 3Opinion

GROSSMAN, Vice-chairperson.

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge Joseph W. O’Flaherty of the Placer County Superior Court. Judge O’Flaherty *CJP Supp. 4is represented by James A. Murphy, Esq., and Harlan B. Watkins, Esq., of Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney of San Francisco, California. The examiners for the commission are Jack Coyle, Esq., and Bradford Battson, Esq.

In section I, we set forth the masters’ final report in its entirety and adopt it (except as noted in fn. 1, at p. 6, post) as the foundation for the commission’s decision in this matter. In part II, we…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API