Washburn v. Lucas
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentO’Hara, J.
I agree with the result sought by Mr. Justice Adams but I record an observation which I feel is indicated. The testimony of Trooper Wade quoted by Justice Adams was elicited on cross-examination, and for this reason objection thereto by defendant’s examining counsel was possible only upon the ground of nonresponsivity. Such *617objection was apparently not made and counsel does not claim error, here on appeal, in the admission of such testimony. However, I would like to make clear that in my view the testimony was highly prejudicial and far exceeded the limit of opinion testimony even by an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Maben v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.