Legal Opinion

Reihl v. Wynne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 13, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

The present proceeding was instituted by the relator for the purpose of testing the validity of the appointment of James E. Wynne, the respondent, to the office of councilman of the borough of East Paterson. Baymond E. Eeihl, the relator, while a member of the council, having been elected to the office of mayor of the borough in the year 1927, assumed the duties of the latter office on January 1st, 1928, at the same time resigning his membership in the borough council. At several meetings of the council held during the next…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beard v. AldrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Harcher v. HurleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Scott v. CholmondeleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. HoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API