People v. Sadler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). Although the defendant did raise a similar argument in his motion pursuant to CPL article 330 to set aside the verdict, raising such an argument for the first time in such a motion is not sufficient to preserve a claim for appellate review (see People v Padro, 75 NY2d 820, 821 [1990]; People v Donnigan, 31 AD3d 576 [2006]; People v LaGuerre, 29 AD3d 820, 821 [2006]). In any event,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ClergeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.