City of Eldridge v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentHarris, Justice
I believe the majority’s interpretation of rule 179 places unsuccessful litigants in an impossible situation, a situation not demanded nor contemplated by the rule. It seems to me the appeal in this case was timely and that we should consider it on the merits. On the merits I do not believe the plaintiff city' can prevail. Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court.
I. There is some doubt that the conclusion reached by the trial court was demanded by our holdings in Berger v. Amana Society, 257 Iowa 956, 120 N.W.2d 465 (1965) and Petit v. Ervin Clark Constr., Inc., 243 Iowa 118, 49 N.W.2d 508…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of NovakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Jacobs v. StoverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Arnold v. LangSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Popejoy v. EastburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Fjelland v. WemhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.