Legal Opinion

Pedereaux v. Doe

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided June 18, 1984No. Civil No. 81-14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, Chief Judge

*64MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By Order of March 23, 1984, this Court denied the timely motion of defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto. Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b). Defendant was thus free to appeal the judgment entered herein by filing a notice of appeal with the Clerk of this Court on or before April 23, 1984. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) and 26(a). Defendant failed to do so and by motion of May 9, 1984, seeks an extension of time within which to file its notice of appeal.

The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure condition the grant of an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal “upon a showing of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Vicente Pinero Schroeder v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. M.B.M., Inc. v. GeorgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kansas Packing Co. v. LavillaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API