Legal Opinion

CAPITAL AUTOMOBILE COMPANY v. Shinall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 28, 1961No. 38763PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

On the question of the overruling the motion to dismiss the action, the contention by Capital Automobile Company that the petition fails to show that it owed a duty to- the plaintiff is without merit. While there is no duty on the part of the automobile company to give such instructions as are alleged in the petition, we think that under the circumstances alleged such a relationship existed between the parties as would make it a duty on the part of the automobile company to exercise ordinary care in warning the plaintiff against the hazard incurred in carrying out the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chitty v. Horne-Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Chamberlin Co. of America v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AretzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Seagraves v. ABCO Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Eleanor Higginbotham Aretz v. United States of America, Thomas F. Aretz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API