Legal Opinion
Peacock v. Peacock
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 11, 1956No. 19362, 19383PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
The plaintiff in error in the main bill of exceptions contends that, since James Neely Peacock III is now in the Marine Corps, he is in the custody of the United States Marine Corps, which provides him with support and maintenance; and that the plaintiff in error is relieved of any obligation to make payments for-his support and maintenance. There is no merit in this contention. “Where a father against whom had been rendered a judgment for permanent alimony for the support and maintenance of a minor child refused to make the monthly payments so provided for on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Torras v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- W. T. Rawleigh Company v. ForbesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Beasley v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Blackwell v. FarrarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Taylor Bros. v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Koon v. KoonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Adams v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.