Golebiewski v. Great Eastern Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel R. Rosenberg, J.
This is an action to recover for the theft of the plaintiff’s auto, on a policy of insurance. The defendant insurer resists payment of the loss, claiming: breach of the contract of insurance, fraudulent claim, action prematurely brought, and refusal to accept the auto upon recovery.
*999I find that the plaintiff complied with the provisions of the policy and co-operated Avith the insurer. She notified the insurer and the police on the day of the theft, called the insurer a number of times demanding processing of her claim and payment and even went to its adjuster’s office twice and gave him the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bolling v. Northern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Oppenheimer v. Baker & WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- O'Connor v. Maryland Motor Car insSuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973