Legal Opinion

Schultz v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORP.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 2011No. Case 06-CV-622-GKF-PJCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Barry C. Schultz (“Schultz”) brings this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), seeking judicial review of his claim that defendants, UnumProvident Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Unum Corporation (collectively, “Unum”), have underpaid benefits owed to him under a long term total disability insurance policy.

I. Standard of Review

Unum, as administrator of the disability plan, had discretion under the plan to determine Schultz’s eligibility for benefits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API