Kronenberger v. Bierling
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from municipal court, borough of the Bronx, Second district. Action by Jacob ICronenberger against Otto M. Bierling. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
The plaintiff, as a real estate broker, brought this action to recover $100 as his commission for effecting the sale of premises No. 1430 Prospect avenue in behalf of the owner, the defendant. The undisputed facts show that the plaintiff brought one Charles Lindner, a then intending purchaser, to Mrs. Bierling, defendant’s mother, who was authorized to act for him, with the result that the parties came to a complete understanding as to price and terms. Indeed, a deposit of $200 was given by Lindner to Mrs. Bier-ling, and the parties separated with the understanding that a formal contract was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- C. H. Diamond & Co. v. HartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Levy v. KottmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- C. H. Diamond & Co. v. HartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899