People v. Marchand
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, J.
In Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435] (Apprendi), the United States Supreme Court held that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “ ‘any fact (other than prior conviction) that increases the maximum penalty for a crime must be charged in an indictment, submitted to a jury, and proven beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” (Apprendi, supra, 530 U.S. at p. 476 [120 S.Ct. at p. 2355], quoting Jones v. United States (1999) 526 U.S. 227, 243, fn. 6 [119 S.Ct. 1215, 1224, 143 L.Ed.2d 311].) Under subdivision (a)(2)(E) of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.