Legal Opinion

William Carlisle & Co. v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1910No. 2106PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Trinity County. King and others -sued the Carlisle Company for the recovery of land. Plaintiffs recovered and defendant appealed, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

Defendants in error instituted this suit in the District Court of Trinity County against William Carlisle & Company to recover 160 acres of land, being a part of a 320-acre survey patented by the State of Texas to J. S. H. Chessher on the 25th day of July, 1860. The field notes of the said 320-acre, survey read as follows: “Beginning at the FT. E. corner of the J. Hickman survey a stake, a pine bears FT. 40 deg. E. 10 varas, another S. 53 deg. W. 5 varas. Thence S. 15 deg. E. 1120 varas to Hickman’s S. E. corner. Thence S. 75 deg. W. with South boundary line of said survey 80 varas to the FT.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Fitch v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Mansel v. CastlesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Poitevent v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Falls Land & Cattle Co. v. ChisholmTexas Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Benfford Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Easterling v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Battle v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Howland v. HoughTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rhoden v. BergmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API