Legal Opinion

United States v. Porter

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 26, 1982No. NMCM 81 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, Judge:

Appellant assigns the following error: THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY TO AN UNAUTHORIZED ABSENCE COMMENCING ON 30 JUNE 1977 WHEN APPELLANT WAS CHARGED WITH AN ABSENCE COMMENCING ON 16 JUNE 1977 AND IT APPEARED THAT THE ABSENCE COMMENCING ON 30 JUNE 1977 WAS THE SECOND PERIOD OF ABSENCE ENCOMPASSED BY THE PERIOD OF ABSENCE ALLEGED. (R. 8, 9, 11). UNITED STATES v. REEDER, 22 U.S.C.M.A. 11, 46 C.M.R. 11 (1972).

We find no error and affirm.

In United States v. Reeder, 22 U.S.C.M.A. 11, 46 C.M.R. 11 (1972), the accused pled guilty, pursuant to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SpragueU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. DalyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API