Legal Opinion

State v. Fjolander

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1914No. Nos. 18,584 — (6)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Defendant was accused in the municipal court of St. Paul of selling a certain drug within the limits of that city, not being a registered pharmacist, voluntarily appeared in court, pleaded not guilty and was convicted and sentenced by Pinehout, J., as stated in the opinion. Prom the order suspending sentence until May 29, 1914, the state appealed.

1Per curiam

Defendant was prosecuted in the municipal court of the city of St. Paul, under *530the ordinary forms of criminal procedure, for a violation of section 5046, G. S. 1913, prohibiting the sale of certain drugs and poisons by any person other than a registered pharmacist. He was found guilty, and on November 22, 1913, sentenced to pay a fine of $50, or be committed, to the St. Paul workhouse for the term of 30 days. Immediately following the sentence the court entered an order, over the objection of the state, suspending execution thereof until May 29, 1914. The state appealed from that order.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graves v. BackusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Bottomly v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API