Legal Opinion
United States v. Greathouse
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 20, 2003No. CR NO. 02-476PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amended
OPINION & ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Defendant Robert Ian Greathouse is charged in a two-count indictment with the unlawful possession of child pornography in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and a single count of criminal forfeiture of his computer equipment. Defendant moves to suppress all evidence seized from his computer claiming that the search warrant lacked probable cause and that even if there was probable cause for the warrant, there was no probable cause to seize his computer and the officers’ execution of the warrant was overly broad. Defendant also contends that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Gloria Franklin and Johnny Curry v. Derrick FoxworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- United States v. Prideaux-WentzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State Of Iowa Vs. Joshua Daniel FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Mlodzinski v. LewisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.