Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Sawyer

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1980No. 6492PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J..

Plaintiffs-appellants, M. Frank and Mildred Sherman, and Paul and Dee Anna Collier (hereinafter appellants) appeal an order by the circuit court granting defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss. Defendants-appellees (hereinafter appellees) are Stephen and Harriet Sawyer, David and Mitsui Thompson, Paul and Sara Pinsky, and Bernard and Beth Berkov.

Appellants lived in an apartment complex known as the Dynasty Apartments located at 2442 Tusitala Street, Honolulu. Appellees are the owners of this complex. When appellants assumed tenancy in January 1976, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. State v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. PalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Maltais v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API