Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1999No. 96-35285PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WALLACE; Dissent by Judge ALDISERT.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Cody Campbell appeals from a denial of benefits as an alleged surviving child of deceased wage earner Lowell E. Schmidt, under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act). 42 U.S.C. § 402(d). The district court exercised jurisdiction to review this case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying Campbell’s claim for benefits. Campbell timely appealed, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

I

The district court’s order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Jamerson v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wickware v. SessionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gillett-Netting v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Gillett-Netting v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Garnes v. BarnhardtDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  4. 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3905, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4982 Cody Campbell, a Minor by Darlene Campbell, His Guardian v. Kenneth S. Apfel, 1 Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Abell v. Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API