Dugey v. Hughs Bros.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Anderson County.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Will-son, J.
§ 4. Argument; right to open and conclude. A verbal admission of plaintiff’s cause of action made by defendant’s counsel, after the close of the evidence in the case, does not entitle the defendant to open and conclude the argument. When the defendant, before the trial commences, admits specifically the plaintiff’s cause of action, so as to relieve the plaintiff from adducing any proof, and causes this admission to be entered of record, then, and not till then, is he entitled to open and conclude the argument. [Rule 31 for Dist. Courts; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 834; Eastham…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wallace & Co. v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Cloud v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Walcott v. HendrickTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Ammon v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WynnDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1882