Legal Opinion

Covington Drawbridge Company v. SHEPHERD

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1858PublishedCited by 46 opinions

• • This case was brought up, by writ- of error,' from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Indiana. Shepherd and the other defendants in error, styling themselves citizens of Ohio, brought an action of trespass on the case against the Covington Drawbridge Company, citizens of the State of Indiana, for injuries sustained by a steamboat belonging to the plaintiffs, in consequence of negligence in attending to the draw.

Read the full summary

• • This case was brought up, by writ- of error,' from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Indiana. Shepherd and the other defendants in error, styling themselves citizens of Ohio, brought an action of trespass on the case against the Covington Drawbridge Company, citizens of the State of Indiana, for injuries sustained by a steamboat belonging to the plaintiffs, in consequence of negligence in attending to the draw. The defendants pleaded not guilty, and the case was tried by a jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiffs, awarding $6,081.93. There were no prayers to-…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney

The writ of error in this case is brought upon a judgment recovered by Shepherd and others, against the Covington Draw*232bridge Company, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Indiana.

The only error assigned here is, that upon the declaration and pleadings in the case, the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction.

This objection is founded upon the description of the parties in the declaration, which is in the following words:

“Alexander O. Shepherd, Elijah E. Gillan, James Davidson, Samuel McClure, Samuel Peters, and George Willard, citizens of the State of Ohio, plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API