Legal Opinion

Randal v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 1929No. 12650Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

*305“From the concluding allegation of paragraph 3 of the complaint it appears that plaintiff’s intestate was instantly killed, and the demurrer fairly raises the following questions:
“1. Does Act No. 189 of the Acts of 1925, amending Section 2948, Volume 3, Code of 1922, imposing liability upon the State Highway Department for the death of a person ‘through a defect or negligent repair of any road, causeway, ferry or bridge under the control and supervision of the State Highway Department of South Carolina,’ or is the liability…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Sirrine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  5. Foster v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API