Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 3, 1998, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a bond broker, began working for the employer, a securities firm, on October 30, 1997. He subsequently resigned due to the employer’s failure to provide him with a smoke-free work environment. Following a hearing, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant had good cause to leave his employment and was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits. The employer appeals.

We affirm.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newark Valley Central School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In re the Claim of HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. In re the Claim of LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PinedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of KregerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API