Boone v. Henry
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Claudya Plenry recovered judgment' against defendant J. W. Boone for an alleged breach of promise to marry. Defendant has appealed.
Appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to show the existence of a contract to marry. In view of the fact that a new .trial must be ordered for other reasons, we shall not express an opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence, further than to say that we do not consider that the state of the record would authorize us to render judgment for appellant on this ground. The Supreme Court has stated the rule as follows:…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- International-Great Northern R. v. IcingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Hillebrant v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Nicholson v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Forquer v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Nacim v. IbarraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985