Legal Opinion

Scozio Enterpises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

In these consolidated cases Scozio Enterprises, Inc. (Employer) petitions for review of orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that affirmed decisions of a referee determining that Kimberly L. D’Amico, as representative claimant, and Rita M. Farrell (Claimants) were not ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits for specified weeks under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(d).

I

Employer questions whether the Board’s finding that it was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Wetzel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Sensenig v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Canonsburg General Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Stanley Flagg & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API