Legal Opinion · Dissent

Freligh v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 2017No. 524460Published

1DissentEgan Jr., J.

The crux of defendant’s argument upon appeal is that, as of the filing of plaintiff’s application for no-fault benefits, his alleged future employer, VW Parts, Inc. (hereinafter the parts business), “was a defunct business” and, therefore, “there was no actual employment available to plaintiff.” Absent a legitimate job opportunity, defendant’s argument — and the majority’s premise — continues, plaintiff’s claim for lost wages is entirely speculative, thereby warranting dismissal thereof. We disagree and, therefore, respectfully dissent.

To our analysis, the majority has engaged in an unduly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Queensbury Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Giglio v. Saratoga Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API