Cunningham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that we reached a wrong conclusion in holding that the evidence showed a joint sale of liquor to Brooks and Tutt as was alleged in the indictment.
Brooks and Tutt were working in a sand pit about twenty-five or thirty feet from the road. Tutt testified as to what occurred as follows:
“Mr. Cunningham came up in a Ford roadster and stopped and called me out there, — when he stopped he picked up a pint and held it out and asked us if we wanted it. I asked Ennis (Brooks) and he said ‘Hell, yes, we’ll take two of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- O'Shennessey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Tippit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.