Leon Hersch Corp. v. Goldberg
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
Upon the trial it was proven that one Pincus Cohen had sold his entire stock of jewelry and fixtures in his retail jewelry business, conducted under the name of “ Coles ” in the city of Buffalo, and that neither the seller nor the purchaser, the defendant, Max Goldberg, gave the five days’ notice in writing to the creditors, *858as provided in section 44 of the Personal Property Law (as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 507).
It was further proven that certain judgments had been secured against said Pincus Cohen. Further proof Was made that there were a number of creditors of the said Pincus Cohen, but…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Gabbe v. Kleban Drug Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Braun v. American Laundry MacH. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. GinsbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Thorndike & Hix Lobster Co. v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928