Emeterio v. Clint Hurt and Assocs.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Rose, L,
concurring and dissenting:
I concur in the analysis set forth in the majority opinion, except for the final conclusion that the appellants’ interest in the West Virginia property was insufficient to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction over them. To this conclusion I dissent.
Jurisdictional assertions based on ownership of property within the forum state must meet the traditional minimum contacts test. Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 213 (1977). However, where the property gives rise to and is the subject matter of the litigation, a finding of personal jurisdiction generally…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Chester A. Anderson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Equitable Trust Co. v. O'NEILLSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
- First Texas Savings Ass'n v. BernsenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996