Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Allgood

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 7, 1995No. 93-5022; CMR No. 9202302Published

1Concurrence

GIERKE, Judge,

with whom

CRAWFORD, Judge,

joins (concurring):

14. The first certified question raises two subsidiary issues: (1) Did the redesignation of the unit terminate the secretarial designation of the unit commander as a general court-martial convening authority; and (2) Did the redesignation terminate the existence of the unit?

15. I agree with the majority that the first subsidiary question need not be answered in this case. 41 MJ at 493 n. 2. Colonel Warner was a general court-martial convening authority in his own right by virtue of the secretarial grant of authority on October 23,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. AllgoodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API