Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Massman Construction Co. v. Buzard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 11, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. Relator seeks to prohibit respondent Judge from proceeding, in the case of Nelson v. Massman Construction Company, to hear and determine the petition of respondent Deacy (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) to establish a lien for an attorney's fee, against the judgment in favor of Nelson, and to recover the amount thereof from relator.

The ground for prohibition is that petitioner has not stated a cause of action and under the admitted facts cannot state a cause of action. [State ex rel. Smith v. Joynt, 344 Mo. 686,127 S.W.2d 708; State ex…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. National Refining Co. v. SeehornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Alton Railroad Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Mills v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Mann v. Bank of GreenfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Mansfield v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Reed v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Siegel v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Schoenbacher v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Henry v. CracraftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API