Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*922The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643; hereinafter the 2005 DLRA) on substantial justice grounds. The defendant has a prior criminal history dating back to 1987, which includes two drug-related felonies. Moreover, the 2005 DLRA expressly permits the court to consider the institutional record of confinement of the person seeking resentencing (see Drug Law Reform Act, L 2005, ch 643, § 1; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156 [2008]; People v Vega, 40 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. CurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. RiversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. OvertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. WitkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. HickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. ConcepcionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API