Legal Opinion

Antietam Paper Co. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Civil action, tried before Hoke, J., and a jury, at April Term, 1894, of Wake Superior Court. The defendant Holt appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Burwell.

1Opinion of the Court

Burwell, J.:

This appeal brings up for our consideration the exceptions taken on the trial by the defendant Holt alone. His controversy in this action was with his co-defendant Josephús Daniels, to whom the defendant The Chronicle Publishing Company had executed a mortgage on March 24, 1892, to secure a debt of $2,600, evidenced by two bonds of that date, one for $1,000, due February 1,1893, and the other for $1,600, due February 1,. 1894.

We have adjudged that that mortgage and those bonds were valid acts of that corporation, and that by virtue thereof the owners of those bonds had a lien on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuthbertson v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Davidson v. . GiffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Vaughan v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Henderson Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Morrisett v. Elizabeth City Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Simmons v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. State Ex Rel. Moseley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API