Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Warner
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 29, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
This case has been presented to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, supplemented by oral testimony introduced on hehalf of the state of Oklahoma, through the county attorney of Ottawa county, and the testimony of the petitioner, Charles Warner. The agreed statement of facts is as follows:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the said Charles Warner and the state of Oklahoma:
“(1) That the said Charles Warner is and. was a prohibition agent at the time of the acts herein complained of.
“(2) That, at the time of the acts herein complained of, he was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re LoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ohio v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States Ex Rel. Drury v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re McShane's PetitionDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Rosa Carter, Administratrix of the Estate of Adrian Miles Carter, Deceased, Cross-Appellee v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Stinnett v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- State of Conn. v. MarraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- State of Idaho v. Lon T. HoriuchiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.