Legal Opinion

Pascucci v. Bowen

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 19, 1987No. 85 C 3996Published

1Opinion of the Court

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Thelma Pascucci brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review a final determination of defendant denying *1003plaintiff’s application for wife’s insurance benefits.

Under 42 U.S.C. § 402(b)(1) a “wife” of an individual entitled to old-age insurance benefits is herself entitled to apply for benefits. Under 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(1)(A) an applicant is the “wife” of the individual if the courts of the state of the insured individual’s domicile would find that the applicant and the individual “were validly married” at the time of the application. The government…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frieda Rosenberg v. Elliot Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Mary Kirkland v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Sorrentino v. MierzwaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API