Langford v. United States
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. John Langford aiid Dave Langford were convicted of larceny. They appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtClayton, J.
The only proposition urged by counsel for appellants is that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that a witness for the government — J. H. Brown (• — was permitted to testify without having been sworn. The question was first raised by the motion for new trial, no objection having been made before verdict. Affidavits of some of the jurors who tried the case were offered, in support of the motion for new trial, to the effect that the testimony of the witness Brown had great weight in securing a conviction; and one juror made affidavit “that his vote was for acquittal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Wilder v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
- Redd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- People v. BellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Sewall v. Spinney Creek Oyster Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Keeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Keeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.