Legal Opinion

South End Enterprises, Inc. v. City of York

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The City of York appeals a writ of mandamus issued to it by the Court of Common Pleas of York County (trial court) upon request of South End Enterprises, Inc. The writ directs the City, first, to “employ the necessary labor and materials” to stabilize the other half of a double house owned by South End and, second, to reimburse South End for its lost rental income at the rate of $445 per month until the City’s work is done. Agreeing with the City that this writ exceeds the bounds of mandamus, in that it seeks to compel the City’s exercise of discretion in a particular…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Gardner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. MenezesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamar Advertising Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Municipality of MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. City of Providence v. Estate of TarroSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. In Re: The Appeal of the Borough of Renovo ~ Appeal of: D. PagnottoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. R.E. Grabowsky v. Borough of Whitehall, a PA Municipal Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. South End Enterprises, Inc. v. City of YorkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API