Legal Opinion

State v. Tinsley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1929No. 3318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Appellant was convicted under air indictment charging him with operating an automobile within the corporate limits of the town of Las Cruces, in violation of section 26, c. ISO, Laws of 1919, which is as follows:

“Any person who shall, while in an intoxicated condition, operate or attempt to operate a motor vehicle upon any public highway or within any incorporated city, town or village within this state, shall, upon conviction, be subject to imprisonment for a period of not less than thirty days or more than one year and a fine of not less than one hundred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CuldiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. FergusonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stuart v. McVeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Sanchez v. StapletonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. KlantchnekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API