Legal Opinion
Bartels v. New York Lithographers' & Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1969No. 66 Civ. 1089PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LEVET, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert Bartels, relying for jurisdiction on Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S. C. § 185, brings suit against the defendant, , New York Lithographers’ and Photo-Engravers’ Union No. One-P (hereinafter “the union”), alleging breach of the union’s duty of fair representation. Pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the issue of liability was tried before this court without a jury.
The contentions of the parties may be stated generally as follows;
PLAINTIFF’S CONTENTIONS
1.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Leo Desrosiers v. American Cyanamid Company, and International Chemical Workers Union a.f.l.-c.i.o. Local No. 436Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sucrest Corporation and Sugar Workers Council of North America, I. L. A., Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morpurgo v. Bd. of Higher Ed. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Szarka v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Bartels v. New York Lithographers' & Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-PCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Lowe v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 705Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Robert Bartels v. New York Lithographers' and Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P, Formerly Known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. OneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970