Legal Opinion

Scott v. University of Michigan Athletic Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1908No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Case by Frank W. Scott against the University of Michigan Athletic Association and others for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and . plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Testimony was given from which the jury might have found that plaintiff was injured by the collapse of a stand, or bleacher, erected by the defendant association, for the use of and used by the public, at a game of football to which the public was invited and required to pay an admission fee for the profit of said association; that the stand, designed to support 5,000 spectators, collapsed, from inherent and discoverable weakness, when put to its intended use, when occupied by less than 3,000 persons. At the trial, both parties introduced testimony and the court, without, so far as the record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. Buffalo ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Birmingham Amusement Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API