Legal Opinion
Hart v. City of New Orleans
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
Decided May 27, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On Opposition and Motions to Quash Seizures.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, C. J.
The plaintiff, having obtained judgment against the defendant, has taken out execution and garnishment process and seized the amounts due from two of the city street railroad companies as a bonus for the privileges granted, and the interest of the city in the sugar-shed warehouses. The judgment obtained is absolute, except a restriction that in case resort is had to court for a mandamus to compel the levy of a tax to pay tlie judgment, regard shall be had to the legislative limitations on taxation during the several years that the obligations upon which the judgment was founded were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Holladay v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of New Orleans v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
- McEnery v. PargoudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Kaill v. Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- C. J. Kubach Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935