Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Sukut

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bronson, Oh. J.

This is an action upon a promissory noto. . Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying judgment non obstante, or, in the alternative, a new trial. Three different juries have considered the merits. The first jury found in favor of the defendant. The second jury disagreed. Thereupon the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. This court, upon such appeal, reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial. State Bank v. Sukut, 48 N. D. 987, 187 N. W. 960. This cause, accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SukutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Korol v. AronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API