State Bank v. Sukut
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bronson, Oh. J.
This is an action upon a promissory noto. . Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying judgment non obstante, or, in the alternative, a new trial. Three different juries have considered the merits. The first jury found in favor of the defendant. The second jury disagreed. Thereupon the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. This court, upon such appeal, reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial. State Bank v. Sukut, 48 N. D. 987, 187 N. W. 960. This cause, accordingly,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SukutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Korol v. AronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985