Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Lowthrop

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill in Equity for specific performance of a contract to sell realty. Heard upon bill and answers.

1Per curiam

The principal question in this case arises on the third clause of the will of Lucina W. Paine, as follows: “Thirdly, I give and devise to my nephew, John Albert Paine, the other half of my real estate during his natural life, and after his decease to his heirs, their heirs and assigns forever.” The question is, whether said John Albert took under said clause an estate in fee simple, or only an estate' for life. It is admitted that he would have taken a fee simple under the rule in Shelley’s case, if the words “ their heirs and assigns forever ” had not been added to the words “ his heirs.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Osborne v. ShrieveU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1824

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harlan v. ManingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API