Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1935No. Civ. 9175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Richard Bailey and Minnie Bailey, his wife, were injured when their automobile in which they were riding was struck by a car operated by the Market Street Railway Company. They commenced appropriate actions to recover damages. The defendant answered in both actions and thereafter for the purposes of the trial the ac tions were consolidated. A trial was had before the court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of each plaintiff and from the judgments entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

Shortly after the actions were commenced the deposition of each plaintiff was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Bennett v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Ballou v. Andrews Banking Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heiman v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Amendt v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection v. HowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection v. HowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API