Legal Opinion
Oneida Ltd. v. Utica Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William F. O’Brien, III, J.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Plaintiff Oneida Ltd. moves for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination as to whether Utica Mutual or Republic Western, two of plaintiffs’ insurance carriers, will be obligated to provide coverage for any liability exceeding $1,000,000 (the purported limit of the Republic Western policy)1 resulting from pending personal injury actions commenced by Darrin and Raymond Ketchum (the Ketchum brothers), two employees of Camden Wire Co., Inc. (Camden Wire), who were involved in a workplace…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Wolfe v. Sibley Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance v. Bakers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Loblaw, Inc. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Dayton Tool & Die Works, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.