Legal Opinion

Anselmo v. Pisciotta

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1927No. 10,759PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

In the case of Modenbach vs. Van Smooth, No. 8559 of this; court, a motion was made to dismiss the: *88.appeal on the. ground that the motion of appeal had been filed after the time allowed by Act 128 of 1921.

The facts in that case were that the judgment had been rendered and signed January 18, 1922; the motion for a new trial was filed on January 21, 1922, and was refused on January 31, 1922, the petition for appeal was filed, and granted on February 1, 1922, more than ten days after the rendition of the judgment.

This court decided ou June 18, 1922:

“It is true that this Act provides that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

State v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
Durbridge v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
Mercer v. Natchez, B. & S. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
N. O. Motor Co. v. KeltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
State ex rel. Allen v. Judge of the Twenty-Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

Evans v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932