Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1887No. 12393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to vacate a judgment. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

■ Motion to dismiss an appeal.

It appears that plaintiff filed her notice of appeal to this court on the eighteenth day of August, 1887.

On the twenty-third day of August an order of the *105judge of the court below was made and filed, extending the time of plaintiff to file an undertaking on appeal twenty days, and on the twelfth day of September a similar order was made and filed extending the time for a further term of ten days.

An undertaking was filed September 22, 1887, which was in due time, provided the court below, or a judge thereof, had authority to extend the time for filing such…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Public Opinion Pub. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Schloesser v. OwenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Opinion No. Oag 12-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
  4. Schloesser v. OwenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Schloesser v. OwenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API