Legal Opinion

Blum v. Sea Gate Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1938Published

1Opinion of the CourtAdel, J.

Facts pertinent to this appeal are stated in the opinion of Tenenbaum v. Sea Gate Association (253 App. Div. 166), handed down herewith. Some other and different facts apply to plaintiff Blum. She obtained title to her property, which is located in Sea Gate, in March, 1935, by foreclosure of a mortgage that she acquired in 1934. At those times both the outside fence and the beach fence had been erected and in use for many years. Plaintiff Blum did not become a member of the defendant association; but her immediate predecessor was long a president thereof, and her remote predecessor, Phillips,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erit Realty Corp. v. Sea Gate Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tenenbaum v. Sea Gate Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API